Ruth Thorlby King’s Fund Presentation at our conference March 2006

Why introduce more choice in the NHS?

  • Offering choice: a policy objective in its own right
  • Choice as a mechanism for levering up quality
  • Choice as means to make the NHS a more equitable service

What are the equity problems in the NHS?

  • Choice to go private to get faster/better treatment
  • No evidence of bias on decisions to treat within NHS waiting lists
  • Lower intervention rates + higher prevalence amongst poorer groups

Examples of Inequities

  • Unemployed, and individuals with low income and poor educational qualifications use health services less relative to need than the employed, the rich and the better educated.
  • Intervention rates of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG) or angiography following heart attack (AMI) were 30% lower in lowest socio-economic groups than the highest.
  • Hip replacements were 20% lower among lower socio-economic groups despite roughly 30% higher need.

(from Julian Le Grand’s LSE lecture)

What choices have been made available in the NHS?

  • Choice of hospital, for elective outpatient appointment, once a GP has decided to refer
  • Not maternity, cancer and selected others
  • Choice of hospital outpatient: designed as a tactic to reduce waiting times

No imminent, realistic choice of GP

Direct payments: social care

How could choice fix these inequities?

  • Current patient choice policy: not designed to make any impact on these inequities
  • Will require investment in advocacy and information to avoid creating a new dimension of inequity
  • Information: to be made aware of choice (equal opportunity to choose)
  • Information: allows creation of appropriate services

Choice theory

  • Movement of patients sends a “signal” to providers to change
  • Patients need information relevant to their needs
  • Providers: need to know why patients are choosing them or choosing to avoid them (market research)

Study of HIV units and choice

People with HIV: can refer themselves to unit of their choice

Money followed patient (roughly)

Five units in London: qualitative interviews

Why did patients move? With what information?

Any effect on providers?

Patients

  • Some moved- a minority
  • In search of anonymity, but also better quality care-considerable distances
  • Used internet, written information
  • Word of mouth, especially peer groups and support groups trusted the most
  • No comparable Trust data

Did providers care if patients left?

For a while, amongst senior staff

Focused minds on waiting rooms, politeness of staff, extra services, timing of services

Clinical quality?

Other factors: resources, autonomy, HIV a special case . During the period in question cash for HIV services was plentiful

HIV Allocations by region

The economics of HIV services has changed since the period of the research:

HIV diagnoses and deaths

Choice: the ideal?

“I can remember seven, eight years ago, if a patient transferred to another unit you would get b*llcked from a dizzy height- how dare you, what did you do wrong, why did that patient transfer? I mean all hell broke loose, what were you doing wrong that meant the patient was unhappy? Senior doctor Trust C

Choice: the dream

“There have been times when I’ve had to send my patients to a consultant outside the HIV unit and there have been times when those consultants have been off-hand with my patients. I’ve had to phone them and explain that if I behaved like that with my patients, I wouldn’t have any patients” Consultant Trust E

Choice in HIV: reality

  • Perception: educated (white, gay) men more inclined to move
  • Small units: less evidence of patient movement
  • Two big units: patients travel from all over England
  • Quality? No evidence of difference
  • Differentiation of services

Can more choice mean more equity?

  • Current patient choice policy: limited impact on big inequities
  • Advocacy and information is expensive: where are the incentives?
  • Good quality information: will consumers use it?
  • Skewed investment into “peripherals”?

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 827 other subscribers.

Follow us on Twitter