Category Archives: Nursing

All the Tory contenders to be prime minister should categorially rule out the NHS being part of any future US/UK trade deal, Unite, Britain and Ireland’s largest union, said today (Wednesday 5 June).
Unite, which has 100,000 members in the health service, said the new prime minister ‘should not offer up the NHS as a sacrificial lamb to US president Donald Trump’.
Unite national officer for health Colenzo Jarrett-Thorpe said: “The Tory prime ministerial contenders need to put the national interest – in this case, the safeguarding the NHS from US privateers – before the personal ambition of getting their hands on the keys to 10 Downing Street.” 
Concern about what a US/UK trade deal could mean for the NHS has heightened this week following remarks by Donald Trump and his ambassador in London, Woody Johnson about the NHS being included in a future US trade deal
Colenzo Jarrett-Thorpe added: “The NHS is the UK’s greatest achievement – but for Trump and his ilk, who despise the very idea of universal healthcare free at the point of delivery, all they can see is the money to be made from the sick, frail and vulnerable. 
“This was made obvious by the US ambassador’s very frank comments about his country’s intentions towards the NHS in any future US/UK trade deal, a point that was again made by Trump himself. The president’s comments today are not reassuring in any way. Unless the government categorically says that the NHS is not for sale, then patients and staff will face increasing uncertainty and worry.
“The Tory leadership hopefuls need to state categorially to the British public that the NHS is not up for sale to profit hungry US private healthcare companies as part of a future trade deal.
‘Leading Tories and their cheerleaders in the media may think that the US offers a blueprint for how a post-Brexit Britain should be – however, it should not be forgotten that millions of Americans don’t have any health insurance which does not inspire confidence.
“We strongly believe that the NHS should not be offered up as a free trade sacrificial lamb to the mercurial whims of Donald Trump – our sick, frail and vulnerable deserve so much better.”


Leave a comment

Responding to the Health Secretary’s pledge to overhaul mental health and wellbeing services for NHS staff following the launch of a Health Education England review, BMA mental health policy lead, Dr Andrew Molodynski, said:

“Staff are fundamental to the delivery of patient care in the NHS and without a healthy workforce our health service can barely function, let alone thrive.

“Given the current pressures that the NHS workforce is under, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care’s commitment to improving mental health and wellbeing support for staff is both timely and necessary.

“We know that doctors’ mental health and wellbeing has been adversely affected by the increasing demands of their work and this is true also for medical students who are dealing with stress, fatigue and exposure to traumatic clinical situations, very often without adequate support on hand.

“The BMA recently for greater provision of mental health support for NHS staff as their report¹ found that only about half of doctors were aware of any services that help them with physical and mental health problems at their workplace – while one in five respondents said that no support services are provided.

“While these measures will go a long way to providing much-needed support for NHS workers who are struggling with their mental health and overall wellbeing, more must be done to address the wider pressures on the system, such as underfunding, workforce shortages and rising patient demand, so we can reduce the number needing to seek help in the first place.”

1 Comment

Wednesday’s budget delivered grim news of poor economic growth over the next few years, compounded by even grimmer jokes. However amongst the cautiously delivered statement seemed to appear one pearl of  policy that should of set every NHS employees heart a flutter. The announcement that funding would be provided to facilitate pay rises for some staff, but this was not the monumental announcement abolishing the pay cap or a U-turn on austerity that some may have hoped for. This announcement came as more of a carrot on a very long string with a few hoops to jump through along the way and it would appear the devil was in the detail. The Chancellor confirmed that this increase in pay would be linked to productivity and pay reform, something that has been mooted before without being fully explained. So the question of whether or not there would be a pay rise has left many nurses, midwives and paramedics scratching their heads.

Union bosses criticised Mr Hammond’s announcement. Unison’s Dave Prentis showed concern that the chancellor was raising the hopes of nurses without putting any extra money on the table, where as the RCN’s Janet Davies warned that any pay rise should not be linked to staff working harder highlighting the fact that nurses have had their pay frozen for the past 7 years and that any increase would only deliver what had been lost. So what could this announcement mean for nurses ?

It is no secret that the NHS faces a funding black hole despite receiving an extra 2.8 billion this budget, with the government hoping the restructuring of services will help plug the gap. Many NHS staff are paid via an agreement called Agenda For Change which allows for universal pay across the NHS as well as providing incremental pay increases linked to progression.

2016 saw Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt embroiled in a row with doctor’s over contracts that many labeled unfair but the government said were necessary to modernise the health service. It is thought that the same will happen again with Mr Hunt setting his eyes on aspects of the Agenda For Change agreement particularly surrounding enhanced unsociable hours payments given for night shifts and weekends when he submits evidence to the NHS Pay review body in the next few weeks. It is  also felt that the Government will attempt to redefine the working day in line with their 7 day service strategy. This could see unsociable hours pay kicking in much later in the evening and being abolished at weekends. Other possible changes could include smaller incremental progression pay rises as well as getting rid of any overlapping pay structures between bands. meaning those nurses who reach the top of their band, don’t progress or rely on extra hours payments may see the long term pay drop further despite any pay increase.

1 Comment
The pace of change in health visiting over the past few years has been hectic, traumatic at times and stressful, but have the rewards promised been delivered?
Health visitors welcomed standards and national recognition but the next phase is not certain at all. We, as with our School nurse colleagues transferred to Local Authority Commissioning this year. We have worked hard to ensure commissioners were ready for us and know what we do, how we respond to populations and need. Lots of good standards have been written down but sadly this is where I fear the wheels fall off.
 Government cuts have hit Local Authorities. Hard. The honeymoon period has been short for our school nurses who now find themselves an expensive service that no one wants. Commissioning is looking at getting a complex professional service but finds there is not the money to pay for dedicated, well educated  professional SCPHNs.

Is this the future also for Health Visiting?

Currently many health visiting services are finding that managers are looking at how they deliver the service that is being “paid for” and “counted” rather than the comprehensive complex relationship building, nurturing service that health visitors are trained to do. Yes I celebrated the enshrinement of the 5 mandated contacts and the 4,5,6 model but this is a bare minimum, what if a provider interprets that as a set service delivery standard? Do we continue to anticipate need? A core principle of health visiting is the search for health needs

I’m a Health Visitor in the NHS. My job is to provide a universal service to children until they go to school that will monitor their health and well being and safeguard them

The safeguarding of children depends on so many factors. But it’s not just the job of health visitors to protect children, it’s the role of families and families currently are under massive pressure.  Cameron’s government talked about Troubled Families but those of us working day to day are finding families in trouble, they have more stress than ever before. Mums and dads are working 2/3 part time jobs. We are there to support them.
 These children and their parents have little expectation of us. They become lost to services and when, as we have heard so much recently, they are living in fear there is no one to trust, no one to support them. Safeguarding children does not start with social workers, it’s about visible children supported in their communities but we need commitment to maintain universal services from Health Visitors and School Nurses to ensure our children are never unseen or unheard.

No one else will

So, we move forwards to the here and now.
health visitor
Is this is it? I’m in consultation phase and I’m at risk of being down banded or made redundant. So too are my colleagues across England.  So have we lost the fight? Do we give up now, go back to our areas and tough it out, having our own individual battles? When it’s done do we reflect on when things were good, what we could have done who’s at fault?
Just the sound of this is too awful to imagine.
So what do we do?  We look for inspiration. Whether it be current or past. The Practice teacher that inspired you, the mum that fought against the odds for her child, women like Marie Stopes, the women that started us off in 1862, those that went on to do their bit for women’s suffrage.  We take their example and adapt, we owe it to our children and communities to stand up and fight these cuts to a service we built for them.
It’s not just a job. It’s a service that will disappear unless we shout out. We are the invisible support. There’s a presumption we will always be there from our colleagues in Health and Social care and by the public.
In Worcestershire recently we raised the “What if” question and were bombarded by mums and families asking what if their health visitor had not been there, asked, enquired? They showed how much health visiting affects families.
Last week I heard stated that we shouldn’t worry about the lack of follow ups a and chasing contacts. She cited the example that “no one else does, a GP wouldn’t call to see why an appointment is missed”. But that’s exactly the point. No One else does. The under 5s are too easily invisible and we have seen again and again the tragedy of invisible children, lost from the eyes of their neighbours.  Women with post-natal depression are not wont to shout for help, we know that often unless the health visitor asks no one else does. The Domestic Abuse question, so vital to women and children, if no health visitor who will ask? No one.
I could go on, but I think I’m preaching to the converted.  I know you get the importance and significance of the job. So how do we go forward?
The only way I know is by raising awareness, sharing experiences and campaigning.  We are not reinventing the wheel. So many nurses have had to fight for services in the past.  Health visitors fight daily for housing, safeguarding, GPs to listen to concerns they raise. This should be simple for us. Why so careful?
We have leaders who have given us inspiration, Professor Dame Sarah Cowley spelled it out for us and continues to do so, Dame Elizabeth Anionwu coins the phrase the Radical Health Visitor. It’s my belief that if we aren’t radical we aren’t fulfilling the job description!  They weren’t Dames when they did their work, they were you and me, turning up, doing their best. Use the resources you have, your voices and your Union as so many before have done. No one does this alone.
Support each other, speak out, speak up, challenge, organise and don’t give up. It’s a nothing to lose moment, were in good company with the rest of our NHS and Local Authority colleagues.
So, I’m at the March in London on March 4, I want a block of red ❤️YourHealthVisitors up front – indulge me!  If we don’t fight this No One will.
Tagged | 1 Comment

Students applying for nursing or midwifery courses in 2017 will already be aware that they are no longer eligible for government bursaries, which have been scrapped by the Tories in a bid to save £800m of public spending. While this change will result in financial uncertainty for many students, the removal of bursaries could spell even greater uncertainty for the National Health Service in the next few years.

Under the bursary system, Health Education England funded a fixed number of places based upon local ‘workforce plans’, designed to fulfil the needs of the NHS locally. The government argues that by removing a cap on the number of funded places, the removal of bursaries could result in an increase of 10,000 places by 2020. Yet some experts disagree. Estimates by London Economics suggest that because of the removal of bursaries, nursing admissions could fall by 6-7 percent in the first year alone, leading to “a significant increase in staff shortages in the medium term”.

There is a distinct shortage of nurses and assistant health practitioners within our health service – a shortage of 15,000 to be precise – so it seems counter-productive to be cutting investment at a time when we should be attracting applicants to study nursing. It is hard to see the logic in shifting the financial burden from the taxpayer to individual students, considering that, on average, 70 percent of students never fully repay their loans, meaning that the taxpayer ultimately foots the bill anyway.

But even if the government’s forecasts turn out to be correct, there is no telling what types of nurses and allied health professionals are likely to be trained under the new system. Without the financial guarantee which bursaries provide, universities may be tempted to cut the numbers of less popular, specialised courses like child psychology, while expanding upon popular courses such as physiotherapy. HEE warns that,

If the commissioning of education is not efficient and effective, then attrition potentially goes up, people leave the courses or graduate with the wrong attitude…this impacts on the tax payer in a number of ways.”

By replacing workforce plans designed to meet the needs of the NHS with a system driven by market values, it is possible that an unfunded system could result in a shortage of highly valued and specialised nurses and AHPs, while unneeded specialities become flooded with new graduates. As none of this training will have occurred with specific vacancies in mind some graduates may find themselves struggling to find a job, despite having incurred thousands of pounds of student debt.

The political choice to detach recruitment from the needs of the NHS runs the risk that many graduates may end up taking jobs elsewhere. One particular weakness of government-funded places was that graduates could take up jobs within the private sector or abroad, with absolutely no obligation to work within the NHS after they graduated. But whilst the bursary system was far from perfect, the new system does even less to incentivise people to study nursing in the first place and to pursue careers within the health service.

What is particularly uncertain is who exactly will be responsible for meeting the workforce needs of the NHS once funded places have been completely abolished. If HEE remains ultimately accountable for NHS staffing, it will have to look at other non-financial incentives and soft ‘nudging’ to convince people to take up nursing in spite of the associated debts.

While the rest of the NHS is supposedly getting to grips with Sustainability and Transformation Plans and the devolution of healthcare, the removal of nursing bursaries seems to relinquish some of the control which would make local workforce plans easier to plan and carry out. The full effect of these bursary cuts will not be felt until 2020, when the first cohort of students who enrolled in 2017 will finish their courses. If Labour were to win the next general election, therefore, they could find themselves having to explain an NHS workforce crisis conceived under the Tories.

This was first published by the Fabian Society in Anticipations winter 2016

Tagged | 3 Comments

In its early days, the NHS was an institution that valued and worked in accordance with a strict hierarchy. Consultants and other doctors occupied the top positions, with nurses taking their much lowlier place close to the bottom of the pile. The gender of those who staffed our hospitals and surgeries also reflected a wider societal gender divide, with almost exclusively female nurses existing primarily to enact the wishes of almost exclusively male doctors. Decision-making rights were concentrated amongst the males, at the top of the NHS power structure.

Nursing today is a very different proposition and, rather than being ‘trained on the job’ in a piecemeal way, the vast majority of nurses today either hold a degree or are studying towards one. Additionally, many of the qualifications nurses are achieving are in specialist medical areas. Nurses are no longer auxiliaries to the main medical prowess of doctors- they are experts in their own right, holding valuable knowledge and insight in areas like diabetes, obesity, obstetrics, pharmacology, pain control… the list is endless. With their new expertise, these nurses have achieved higher pay scales, with many reaching the earning power of their doctor colleagues.

So, why are these changes taking place?

There are a number of reasons, both societal and scientific. In society more broadly the lines between traditionally ‘male’ and ‘female’ roles have become very blurred. Although nursing as a profession remains dominated by women, that too is gradually changing. There are far more male nurses today than there were even a few decades ago, and there are also a much greater number of female doctors. In fact, today more women go to medical school than men. In the UK, in 2013, some 55% of first year medical students were female. As the old-fashioned division between male / female, doctor /nurse breaks down, so to does the way we, as patients and colleagues, perceive the roles. However, changes to the nursing profession don’t only reflect a shift in gender roles; the way the role is changing is also down to major technological and scientific advances.

New nursing methods, innovative machines and better research have freed nurses from many of the labour-intensive chores that once defined their working lives. Like housewives of old, a nurse’s daily life was once full of cleaning; a constant fight against infection and filth. Today, with machinery bearing the brunt of this work, nurses are more likely to be found processing illuminating data or contributing to important research than they are scrubbing floors.

A hierarchy of nursing still exists, as anyone observing a nursing teams’ colour-coded uniforms (which correspond to different band roles) will attest. However, nurses today have opportunities to climb a pay scale ladder and / or to branch off into interesting and rewarding specialisms; something simply not possible 100 or even 50 years ago. Inarguably, these are positive developments, for nurses of either gender, but also for the patients who rely on them.

Tagged | Leave a comment

There may come a time in your life where you and your family can no longer provide the quality of care for your parent, grandparent or partner. You may not have the skill, experience or the facilities to properly care for your loved one in their older years and need help making sure they are cared for in the best way possible. At times like this you may want to consider making use of a residential care home in your area. West Sussex care homes can have a number of benefits for you, your family and your loved one, such as:

  • An Experienced Staff – A residential home is going to have the staff on hand that knows how to deal well with your loved one. The staff will have the education, training and experience in dealing with seniors and know how to provide the best care possible. They can see that all of the needs are met of their residents so that people are able to live happily and comfortably each day. This can include helping with any of the daily needs that may need to be met.

Ashtonleigh Residential Care Home

  • The Right Atmosphere – You will find that a quality care home is going to have all of the best facilities so that your loved one will be as relaxed and comfortable as possible. Rooms will be furnished nicely so that they will feel right at home and they can bring their own items to give the room a familiar touch. There will also be activity areas that provide entertainment and activities regularly. Many homes also have nice gardens and grounds that are available to the residents to enjoy.  A well run home should smell good.
  • Meet New People – A care home can be the ideal place for your loved one to meet new people of his or her age to interact with. This can provide the perfect opportunity for them to be social and be with people that they have something in common with throughout the day. This type of atmosphere can help them to feel happier and much more relaxed.
  • Still Near Home – Take a look at a care home nearby to your own home so you can be sure that you and your family can visit anytime and always be nearby. This will help to provide you with peace of mind and help your loved one know that you will visit often and are there for them.

A residential home can be the perfect solution for everyone involved. You want to be sure to choose a place that has a quality reputation and goes the extra mile to make the home as safe and comfortable as possible. When you are looking for care homes in Crawley you want to be sure to take a look at Ashtonleigh Residential Care Home. Ashtonleigh is a residential home that will provide the best care possible for your family member so that they will feel right at home there and benefit from the care, attention and surroundings.

Tagged | Leave a comment

nursing home

It is never an easy decision to put a parent, grandparent, spouse or relative into a nursing care facility. Unfortunately, a time may arise where the medical circumstances involved mean that you can no longer provide the level of care at home for this person and you may need professional help. This is particularly true of those that may experience issues with senility, Alzheimer’s disease or dementia. You need to know that there are quality places that you can turn to that can provide you with the type of help you are looking for so your family member or loved one can get the help and treatment they need. You will find that nursing homes can be just the right place to assist you if you find one that provides the high level of care to make sure your loved one is happy and healthy.

Knowing the Right Place

There are a few important characteristics you want to look for in a nursing home facility so you can be sure it is the right place for your family member. First, you want to be sure that there is an experienced and quality medical staff available at all times. This means that nursing care is available around the clock should it be necessary and that other medical personnel can be called if needed or steps can be taken so that medical treatment is seen to. Outside of the trained medical staff, you also want the staff to have experienced caregivers that help to support the nursing staff. This means there is staff available to help your loved one with daily care and activities to see that all of their needs are being met.

Activities and Interaction

A good nursing care facility is going to be able to provide many different activities for the residents to keep them engaged and entertained. This can mean everything from providing organized activities and outings in groups to individual options that your loved one may enjoy and benefit from. You also want there to be opportunities for interaction both with the staff and with other residents. Your loved one will benefit from the opportunity of meeting and being with others so they can forge new friendships and be more comfortable in their surroundings each day. This can help to make them feel happier and transition easier to their new home.

You want to be sure that your family member’s needs are all going to be met at whatever facility you choose. Take the time to look over and visit different facilities among the Horsham dementia nursing homes available today. You will find that of the Crawley nursing homes you look at that the Ashton Grange Nursing Home is going to be the best option for you. Ashton Grange offers a high quality facility with the level of care you want for your loved one so you can be sure that they have the quality life that is so important to you.

Tagged | Leave a comment

Nursing roles have always played a large part in all aspects of healthcare and today the diversity of the work involved means that those who choose a career in nursing have more opportunities than ever before.

Of course, across the spectrum of nursing jobs for both women and men there are certain skills needed to cover every discipline. For example, having a high degree of empathy means someone can place themselves in another person’s shoes and have an idea of what they are going through. This can be an essential element in learning how to treat everyone with respect and keep his or her best interests at all times.


Nursing is a career that offers something for everyone when it comes to how far it can be taken. For ambitious people who feel they have something to offer in a leadership role, there is plenty of room for advancement. For those who are happier dealing only with their own responsibilities at work rather than looking after a team of people under them, the day-to-day duties can be rewarding and bring great personal satisfaction.


Of course, the wide range of nursing jobs available covers everything from theatre positions, general hospital ward duties, GP practise nurses and a wealth of opportunities to work in the wider social care sector. All of these services are becoming increasingly vital as the population of the UK gets older and lives longer, and the demand for nurses continues to grow each year.

Of course, the stories about how both the NHS and the social care sector are being hit by cut backs and financial resource challenges during this ‘age of austerity’ are never far from the headlines. However, an Employment Management Company will be able to offer good rates of pay and plenty of opportunities for work, both on long-term placements and short-term contracts. Not only that, but using this kind of service means that getting the right job becomes far more straightforward and simple.

Entry requirements and training

The entry requirements and training needed to start and continue on a career path in nursing vary greatly depending on what direction someone wants to take. Some jobs, such as those in Occupational therapy involve having to be registered with the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC), while others in the social care sector need zero formal qualifications and can offer ‘on the job’ training programmes. There are plenty of part-time and in-service courses available and two or three A-levels will usually help get a foot in the door for further education courses.

However ambitious someone might be or whichever particularly aspect of nursing work is attractive to them, anyone who chooses to build a successful career in nursing knows that they are helping some of the most vulnerable members of society everyday in the course of their work.

Tagged | Leave a comment

In 1987 Brian Turner wrote a seminal text detailing the sociology of the para-medical professions. Whilst some of his work would be contested in a contemporary context (e.g. Nursing may no longer associate itself as para-medical), some of his work still applies. Namely, his assertion that the non-medical health workforce undergoes a process of professionalization. One modern day exemplar of this may be the role of the Ambulance service Paramedics.

Arguably this has been a quiet revolution. One generation of workers has seen the shift from the traditional ‘ambulance man,’ promoted from driving council vehicles, to the graduate profession who now have a place in primary care to assess, prescribe (legislation pending), treat and maintain a patient in their own home. This places them on a par with Nurse Practitioners and other professional such as Physiotherapists and Pharmacists who define themselves as Advanced Practitioners.

There is little to critique in term in terms of the efficacy of these roles. There is widespread consensus that many clients can and should be treated at the right place and right time, rather than taken into a hospital environment. However, there is the wider question of how these roles have emerged and in whose interest do they serve?

A benefit of health policy from 1997 was the principle that each area of the UK can seek to review its own specific health needs and meet these through local health service specifications. This included workforce planning. However, there is a need to undertake this with a view to the longer term and not, as we assert, to fill a void perpetuated by the current Governments Neo-liberal approach to health policy.

There is a notable lack of regulation for all roles that describe themselves as ‘Advanced’. Nurse Practitioners in both secondary and primary care have been arguing for their roles to be recognised through regulatory frameworks for well over a decade.

Without nationally agreed regulation of Advanced Practice (as we do see in Scotland and Wales), Governance will not keep pace with changes in practice. Without Governance, organisational structures will continue to struggle to understand the distinction between roles that specialise and those that are advanced. This debate is not one of semantics, but a very real and distinct method of health care practice.

Whilst the neo-liberal approach to policy in this field (ie a lack of), then there will continue to be a plethora of health professional titles across the sector. To again use Ambulance Paramedics as an example, a quick review of literature finds that Paramedics use the same ‘Advanced’ title if they specialise in trauma and intubation or if they practice in a primary care setting seeking to see, treat and maintain a person in their own home.

Not only is this true in the context of Advanced Practice, there is an emergence of new professional roles such as Physicians Assistants and Primary Care Pharmacists which is adding to the confusion around roles and responsibilities. This crowded primary care environment with a plethora of illegible titles, professions and roles is hard enough for those working within the profession to keep pace with. How then should the wider public, let alone those who are unwell and their families and carers understand this picture? Whilst there may be more areas and professions to seek care from, it may be suggested that there are more professions who may turn clients away for ‘not meeting their criteria’.

The more crowded and confused the landscape becomes, then the more professions may lose sight of their primary purpose. Turner (1987) commented that with the process of professionalization also comes the ‘rise and fall’ of competing professions. Clearly a neo-liberal landscape may be a catalyst for this. We would argue that this is counterproductive and not in the public’s interest. We would seek for professions to focus on their primary aim, the delivery of care for their clients and wider community and not have to be in a position whereby they have to compete for professional space. This competition not only detracts from our professional imperative, but also leads to short term planning through a race to be the first to meet the next policy agenda.

This is not a call for nurses and paramedics etc. to ‘know their place’; we do assert that all health professions should be involved in the wider political context. But rather an argument to seek an end to the competition between professions and to plan for practice in the longer term, practice that is carefully underpinned by socially just principles.

See Turner B, 1987, Medical power and social knowledge, Sage London

Paul Mackreth is a District Nurse and Senior Lecture in Community Nursing at Leeds Beckett University

Fiona Needham – who also contributed –  is a Senior Lecture at Leeds Beckett University and Course Leads a Programme for Advanced Practitioners

Tagged | Leave a comment

Buurtzorg (“care in the community”) is what would be called in the UK a social enterprise which was established in Holland in 2006 as all parties involved started to realise that the demand of providing care by nurses/carers in the community,  caring for the clients in their own home environment, was significantly  increasing. This created a situation in which the nature of providing care  subsequently started to change too.

“Buurtzorg” is in essence a home care organisation working with small and flexible teams; a community nurse and community carers providing care to the clients within their own living environment or house. E.g.  clients being subject to ill health, clients returning home from hospital  or on behalf of their GP; injecting insulin, caring for surgery wounds and dealing with pain relief. Supporting in palliative care is also possible. Each client is allocated a personal nurse/carer. The nature of this “Buurtzorg” is to promote the client’s independence and to increase the opportunity to remain living in their own home as long as possible.

The fully autonomous teams work throughout the Netherlands and all have the authority to take any decision for whatever issue that may arise during their daily involvement with their clients. They therefore have the ability to organise the job without too much management involvement and unnecessary bureaucracy.  Decisions are taken by the nurses/carers working closely with the clients. Although there is one office only within the organisation dealing with administrative issues for the whole of all the teams throughout the Netherlands.  The staff are well-qualified and undertake activity personally which is in other systems are often delegated to unqualified people. This reduces the number of different staff involved in the care of an individual.

The consequence is that the nurses are challenged to have the courage to take the responsibility in taking tough decisions and that working hours are irregular. The nurse/carer is in a direct contact to the client’s GP, (hospital) specialist, or social worker; whoever as professional is involved.

Clients do not pay for “Buurtzorg”. This is funded by general funds within the Dutch healthcare system.  A study by KPMG in 2015 showed that care provided in this way was not more expensive. Care appeared to be higher quality and much more satisfying for staff.

Differences with regular care and general characteristics of “Buurtzorg”;

  • Nurse/carer and client actively work on creating the best possible solutions within their own (professional) support network that results in increasing the client’s independence and quality of life.
  • Providing care is the responsibility of the carer/nurse.
  • Professional care is based on professional standards and is all evidence based and  monitored.
  • Providing care is based on achieving the maximum of effectiveness; care delivered within the exact the time needed; not more and not less time spent and custom made and custom offered care based on the client’s wishes.
  • Hardly any overhead costs.
  • Nature of the care provided is often practical by nature, therefore the provided care is “transparent, visible and measurable”.
  • Aim-purpose “Buurtzorg”: to create the opportunity for clients to live in their own home as long as possible and to avoid that they have to be cared for in elderly homes or hospitals.
  • “Buurtzorg” is highly focused on the client’s availability of (professional) network in the community.




Tagged , | Leave a comment

Just as with the role of alternative and complementary medicine in modern healthcare, there are many misconceptions that are associated with the nursing profession. We have to realize the fact that nursing is not properly understood. This is such a shame since the stereotypes make the entire job of the professionals a lot tougher than it already is. While we are quite sure that you already know that not all the nurses are sexy and you do not believe this myth anymore, those that are highlighted below may still be reality for a lot of people.

Nurses Just Help Doctors

This is one myth that has been around for such a long time now and there is no sign that it will go away soon. The nurses actually treat and diagnose patients every single day. They are in charge of patient education and do work so many hours with not that much time available for them. The nurse is definitely not the doctor’s secretary. The nurse is a true professional.

Nurses Just Wanted To Be Doctors But Failed

This is completely incorrect. The nurses are not medical college drop-outs or individuals that did not manage to become doctors. This is a separate profession and most of the nurses are really passionate about the careers that they are going through. The doctors are trained in order to treat symptoms and diagnoses diseases while nurses are usually trained to offer holistic healthcare. You will see that nurses visit you while in the hospital just for chatting while doctors do not actually stay a lot in the room.

All Nurses Are Women

It is a shame to see so many that look at male nurses and see them as failures since not all nurses are women. This is just a really common myth. Around 6 percent of all the nurses are male and the men are really good at the job that they do. A big reason why this myth still exists is the influence of the media, with many shows still using only female nurses. Do not think about the gender of the nurse since it is completely irrelevant.

Nurses Are Stupid Or Not As Smart As A Doctor

The registered nurse spends over 4 years in medical school and can go through even more education. Nurses need to go through a lot of schooling, go through clinical trials and need to react really fast. The nurse is basically just as intelligent and competent as the physician you trust at the moment. The nurse techs even perform research or publish papers, treat illnesses, administer medication and diagnose patients. Never underestimate the IQ of a nurse. Every single one went through a complex training program that is needed for the license to be obtained.

All Nurses Are The Same

This is another myth that way too many believe. Just as there are differences between cardiologists and gynecologists, different nurses can have different career paths to take. As a simple example, the pediatric nurse is highly skilled in the treatment and care of children. Nurses do specialize, just like the doctors do!

1 Comment
%d bloggers like this: