The Cities and Local Government Devolution Bill, slowly making its way through Parliament, feels like a background presence in conversations about the future of the NHS. With just five months left to fill huge provider deficits, by any means necessary, and with the near certainty of junior doctors going on strike, worries about constitutional tinkering seem almost frivolous.

The healthcare devolution plans emerging from Manchester don’t immediately seem to take us into the unknown. In one light, the new NHS-led regional structure, with its emphasis on settling disputes and coordinating plans, looks not so very different to a good old regional health authority.

But the Devolution Bill lays the foundations for far more ambitious changes: a complete reconstruction of the English state, from which the NHS is not exempted.

New powers

At the heart of the Bill is a new power for the government, through relatively lightly scrutinised secondary legislation, to transfer the functions and property of any “public authority” to a county council or a combined authority. Public authorities include NHS England, CCGs, regulators, and trusts including foundation trusts.

The functions to be transferred could include not just the commissioning, but also the provision of every area of NHS care. Once the Bill becomes law, a one-way process for future devolution will be in place for years, and decades, of further transfers of power.

The NHS will feel very different, even in areas pursuing more limited models of devolution, based on health and wellbeing boards or delegation of NHS powers, as in Manchester.

Even without full control of commissioning, the county council or regional government may come to be understood by the public and NHS staff as the people ultimately in charge of the NHS locally. They will create narratives, priorities and goals for the local health system. They will have the authority to speak for the local system as a whole on disagreements or major decisions. The most ambitious people in the service will gravitate towards them.

Combined authorities and beefed-up councils might fit a formal or informal governing role well: they will have the democratic legitimacy and institutional clout that NHS commissioners have often lacked. But moving towards this would be a profound change.

System with many faces

The NHS would no longer have, as it has for decades, a single, identical structure of commissioning, provider and oversight bodies reproduced in each region.

Mirroring the shift to diverse providers, every area could define and divide up these roles differently. The health service in Suffolk could look barely more similar to that in Norfolk than it does to the service in Northern Ireland.

Some in government hope devolution on this scale will ultimately succeed where Andrew Lansley’s Act failed in taking the national politics out of healthcare. But it will inject a lot of local politics.

When hospitals are financially struggling, or a care scandal is unfolding, the local or regional authority will feel the force of public demand to do something about it – the same force that drives the secretary of state and the Department of Health today.

National and local authorities could catch the NHS in the middle as they both push for their own initiatives and plans. Or they could step back to scapegoat one another – with the local authority blaming problems on austerity from the centre, and the national government professing to have nothing to do with the situation.

Future of funding

We need more clarity from the government about the crucial question of whether funding will follow these functions. Will the money currently given to CCGs based on NHS patient need, under at least some local plans, move into the same pot as other grants and local taxation?

The logic of unlocking savings by sharing back office and estates, and investing in prevention, favours permissiveness in redirecting healthcare funding. But instinctive fears about pothole budgets and new brass knobs on the town hall will rise up in the NHS – while leaders elsewhere in local government will see the relatively abundant health budget as a resource to invest in reform.

MPs still have a lot to do as the Bill continues to crawl through Parliament. It has several anomalies where the NHS is concerned.

The special health devolution procedure on which Manchester will rely seems to exclude GP commissioning. Although government amendments have made some progress, the issue of which parts of past NHS legislation will still apply still needs to be addressed. A serious debate is needed to prepare professionals and the public for what is underway.

But the NHS must also prepare to take centre stage in devolution. Managers and clinical leaders need to make their voices heard through the long process of devolution ahead. And they need to prepare for a less national health service than ever before.

Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

2 Comments

  1. The problem with ‘localism’ is that too often local authorities have the responsibility but not the means to carry out the task. We have seen this with house building. Central government can then sit back with clean hands blaming all problems on poor local government decision making. Without proper fiscal devolution local authorities are on a hiding to nothing.

  2. Diversity = division = divide and conquer, for any thinking person that has been the agenda over the last forty years, slowly break up institutions and public bodies and hand them over to our corporate masters. It isn’t rocket science but why has it taken so long for people to finally wake up.

    I have said it before but I will repeat it because it is fundamental to how these corrupt politicians and their apologists have masked their real intent.

    Money is created out of thin air by the private banks every time they make a loan, 97% of all money in circulation was created this way, similarly the Bank of England the issuer of our currency prints the remaining 3% as cash to be distributed by the banks as hard currency.

    Because this money is only issued as debt we are told that government must raise money for public expenditure through taxation, which is in fact a lie.

    The reason government acts this way is a political choice and fundamental to why the economy is failing, and merely serves the interests of the financial sector. In realty the government issues all money into the economy and therefore does not need to borrow it’s own money from anyone or anywhere. FACT.

    That being the case, all it takes is for ordinary people with an iota of common sense to see that money is being starved in the economy, to promote borrowing from the banks, which unnecessarily indebts the country and it’s people in order to enrich the financial sector, which in turn keeps crashing.

    The Bank of England and the government do not have to borrow money nor does it need to raise money through taxation for public expenditure. The economy is regulated by Taxation and interest rates.

    All that said, it should be obvious to any sane person, who is not corrupt, that we have all the means possible to provide a health care system that meets the needs of people, unless you limit that in order to provide ever mounting profits for the few.

    We are not the Weimar republic as Neo-Liberals are keen to have us believe, we do not have the same limitations that they had to contend with, money is created out of thin air, why should it be only right for the private banks to get free money to use for their own interests, when the very real needs of people are being ignored.

    It is a political choice based on personal greed and advantage, those politicians that have been caught with their hands in the till is all the evidence you need to understand the meaning of Taxis for hire.

    We have all the money we need for our public services, any politician that tells you otherwise is lying to you, but like never before ordinary people need to understand that Neo-Liberalism is transferring wealth and power upwards to the detriment of the rest of us, TTIP is the final stage in the corporate take over of the state, and we all need to understand that whilst uniting to stop it.

    Sit back and do nothing then watch how you become a modern day corporate slave, the Junior Doctors are at least trying to do that now.

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 560 other subscribers.

Follow us on Twitter

%d bloggers like this: