It is obvious that the NHS is facing difficult times with the financial constraints impacting on safe staffing and the quality of care.  But it is still functioning well most of the time – the ambulance arrives, emergency care is still generally excellent, you can get to see a GP, you will get your hospital appointment.  Of much greater concern is the collapse of community and social care; not because of the impact on the NHS which is real enough, but because it is causing unnecessary and unjustifiable suffering for hundreds of thousands of mostly vulnerable people.  We must start thinking about how we might generate more campaigns in that area, instead of a focus wholly on hospitals and GPs.

In our NHS the era of markets is coming to an end. Serco and several other big providers have withdrawn from the clinical care market. There has been little increase in the relatively small proportion of clinical care provided by for profit companies.  Some non-clinical services have been privatised but Commissioning Support Units have mostly collapsed rather than being sold off.

If the Government wants to privatise the NHS they are not doing a very good job of it.  Of  course they may return to that agenda, but at the moment most private providers seem to have concluded that there is no money to be made.  Simon Stevens does not appear to think competition and tendering is important.  The 50 plus major projects he has initiated, from DevoManc downwards, are all undermining the internal market and ignoring the provisions of the 2012 Health and Social Care Act.

The biggest problem at present is the funding of mainstream services.  Spending on social care for all age groups in England is over 10 per cent less than it was in 2009.  40 per cent of care homes for the elderly are below standard. Social care needs a major increase in resources and the NHS appears to need significant additional revenue funding which has been vaguely promised, but also significant investment for new models of care – no sign.

Without extra funding we have an NHS crisis like we used to have, as all vestiges of financial control have been lost.  It is unclear what is to happen to the very large number of NHS providers, and a smaller number of CCGs, which appear to be broke.  In the good old days, before the internal market, what used to happen was that elective surgery would stop in February when the money ran out, and start again on 1st April.  That still happens in Northern Ireland, where average waiting times for elective surgery are now more than a year.  The NI government doesn’t have the money to pay either the NHS or private providers to bring the waiting list down, and of course the UK government doesn’t care.

Similar effects could be seen in England soon. It is clear that the money is running out, and the talk about savings and efficiency is no longer convincing. 75% of hospitals are running deficits, some extremely large. 90% expect to be in deficit by the end of the year.  There will be longer waiting lists, ambulance queues, cancelled operations and more obvious rationing but that does pose a political risk to the government. Less glamorous services like mental health and learning disabilities may be quietly cut.

The money is the issue. Integrating services and public health measures, very desirable in themselves, are not going to save a lot of money in the near future.  In any large organisation there is scope for reducing waste and increasing efficiency, but it’s a fantasy to think that money can be saved on the scale required.

Rather than the government selling NHS organisations or ending the NHS as we know it, the danger is that people with money will seek out private provision, and the NHS will be  left as a poor service for poor people.

There is value in local campaigns against cuts and service reductions and even against outsourcing.  But that has to include cuts in social and community care.

A national campaign against privatisation of the NHS (social care is already privatised) or to reinstate the NHS of three decades ago, ignoring the huge changes since then, didn’t seem to have any resonance with the public in the run up to the general election, and seems even less viable now.

A better campaign would be to support the NHS and campaign for decent funding for all care, especially to alleviate the quiet suffering due to cuts in other public provision.

Only a government can stop privatisation.  We will only get a different government if the opposition can convince the voters that care services will be far better with us in charge and that we are credible as stewards of the public sector.  Campaigning has to take that into account.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Martin, money is not the real issue. The real issue is waste, caused mainly by the constant meddling, tampering and reorganising by successive governments since 1999. The crass privatisation imposed by Cameron et al and the utter incompetent interferences of Hunt are merely the opportunistic behaviour of Tories who exploit the vulnerabilities caused by the previous Labour party’s reorganisations, PFI and IT impositions.
    All this leads me to believe that politicians are brain dead when it comes to understanding how organisations really work. What imbecile would impose the Health and Social Care act on an institution that has just received the highest “customer” rating in 28 years? The Tories – with the criminal collusion from the LibDems.
    The money is needed for repair to the damage caused by the improvements, not for the effective running of the NHS. And we need a revolution.

  2. Peter Mayer says:

    Heresy but I agree. Not just re organisation waste but massive inefficiencies especially at the boundaries between sectors and the seeming impossibility of funding pathways of care but only silos based on sector defence.
    In a recent discussion on devolution a senior minister said the danger of localisation models would be the removal of ministerial overview and implied a worsening of post code differences. Is there really any evidence that government/ministerial overview improves outcomes?

  3. Peter, every time Churchill activated his overview in campaigns in WW2 he made things worse, e.g. the desert campaign, because he was not a seasoned staff officer. The Tories have contrived to put two nincompoops in charge of NHS policy. The first was a man who spent his entire adult life in the political bubble and then designed a camel to replace the thoroughbred that was the NHS.
    The second was at least an entrepreneur who had a small and large SME, and who clearly knows nothing about running a big organisation. Like many small entrepreneurs Hunt is an inveterate meddler, and has become the worst interferer and the most damaging organisation leader since Maxwell. He is hopeless with people and a completely incompetent negotiator, as the Junior Doctor debacle illustrates.
    In a nutshell, the evidence is the opposite. As they say in Yorkshire – get rid!

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 828 other subscribers.

Follow us on Twitter