This charter is both a challenge and a solution to making it easier to improve equitable access to health for all.
It is addressed to all those with decision making power at local and national levels, primarily in England and Wales, including Clinical Commissioning Groups, Commissioning Support Units, Health and Wellbeing Boards, Foundation Trusts, Local Authority Public Health departments, Local Education and Training Boards and their members, Councils, local councillors, local GPs, NHS England, the Department of Health and the department for Communities and Local Government.
It also addresses those with a duty and role to influence those decision-makers – organisations like Healthwatch and governors of Foundation Trusts. The approach championed by this charter will help them in the delivery of their duties to local people, which includes consultation and engagement more broadly as well as their new duties around the social determinants of health, quality of life, isolation, reducing obesity, mental health, and pre-mature mortality.

Why Now?

  1. We welcome the improved health, longevity and health behaviours over the last 20 years, brought about by intelligent increased spending on the NHS and public services. However, these gains are under threat.
  2. Health inequalities persist. People in our least affluent neighbourhoods face earlier death and higher rates of ill-health, and these inequalities will worsen as the weight given to deprivation in funding formulae is weakened.
  3. The NHS and LAs face deep financial cuts. This, combined with what sometimes appears to be inappropriate outsourcing of the public sector, threatens services to our most vulnerable communities.
  4. High cost, high-tech services may show diminishing benefits unless they are complemented by community action.
  5. We now have robust evidence that involving individuals and communities in defining problems and solutions with statutory agencies leads to better outcomes, often at lower cost. The quality of life in a community (its level of social capital) and the level of involvement of individuals, as residents, volunteers or workers, have a marked impact on health and life expectancy.
  6. Working with communities of geography, interest and identity can make life easier for commissioners and providers by inviting responsibility, increasing agency, autonomy, and reducing dependency

Principles for Social Action in Health

  1. Enable people to organise and collaborate to:
    1.  identify their own needs and aspirations;
    2.  take action to exert influence on the decisions which affect their lives; and,
    3.  improve the quality of their own lives, the communities in which they live, and societies of which they are a part.
  2. Address imbalances in power and bring about change founded on social justice, equality and inclusion.
  3. Active communities make a marked difference to their own health and life expectancy.
  4. Co-production between communities and service providers thrives if communities are enabled to become leading players in their own interests.
  5. A needs-and-assets based approach – look for the strong, not the wrong. Even the poorest communities will have some footholds in terms of community groups and willing activists, but they have fewer than well-off areas, facing more obstacles, and with great development potential.
  6. Community development and related activities play a key role in helping develop strong social capital in communities, and therefore have a positive impact on the health and wellbeing of residents.


Develop policies that would make community development part of the normal approach to participation, change, health improvement and reducing health inequalities. These should include:

  1. Every HWB and CCG to have a community development strategy, linking with community engagement by Local Authorities, police, community sector organisations and other services.
  2. Joint Strategic Needs Assessments to become Joint Strategic Needs and Assets Assessments, with a profile of the strengths of the local community as seen in the condition of its groups, organisations and partnerships and in the protective factors for health and wellbeing.
  3. Support investment in community development and social value.
  4. Seek opportunities that support devolvement of power and decision making about service commissioning, delivery, monitoring and resource allocation to communities in a way that is not distorted by competition rules, nor by commercial confidentiality.
  5. All CCG constitutions and plans to include a requirement to collect evidence of community development in their area. All Foundation Trusts to demonstrate in their Annual Quality Report to the community how the evidence collected by CCGs has been used to enhance services delivered by the Foundation Trust.
  6. The continuing assurance process for CCGs to highlight needs and assets-based work.
  7. The CCG Quality Premium to reward evidence of needs and assets-based approaches.
  8. Health Education England and LETBs should ensure workforce capacity and capability in community development.
  9. Public Health England should highlight assets-based approaches and community development in its guidance and develop a community development work programme.
  10. Public Health England should support local authorities and other public health bodies to commission and deliver evidence based community development.
  11.  Local Area Teams should promote community development in their constituent CCGs.
  12. Needs and assets-based working should be incorporated into work on integration. We have seen how communities stimulate cross-sector working.


  1. Inspire residents to become key players in developing their own health and well-being.
  2. Be prepared to listen, respond and begin to work in new ways. This can be turbulent but is highly productive both for communities and the agencies who serve them.
  3. Harness the interventions that have the best evidence and are most reproducible. These include community development or community building or community transformation. Community development can be mainstreamed to a much wider group of agencies than ever before. Initiatives often coalesce into resident-led partnerships.
  4. Develop, through community building, community led neighbourhood partnerships of residents and service providers. These can:
    1. play a key role in improving heath and wellbeing in local communities;
    2. reduce silo thinking;
    3.  improve services and make them more accountable to local people;
    4. bring the whole system of residents, services and elected representatives to bear on complex issues and problems; and,
    5. encourage a greater level of accountability between residents and services.
  5. Active communities need expert support. Community development workers could play a key coordinating / senior practitioner role in supporting other public sector staff to work as effective partners alongside communities.
  6. Consider making the following commitments:
    1. People are keen to take more responsibility for the quality of their own lives – we undertake to promote people’s ability to do so;
    2. People are keen to be of service to others in their community – we undertake to find ways to enable people to do so;
    3. People are keen to learn to manage their own health and wellbeing – we undertake to facilitate this learning and work with people to support self care; and,
    4. People are keen to get to know strangers and extend the range of their community – we undertake to promote public events where people can meet each other.

Produced by the Community Development Group of the NHS Alliance with the assistance of the Health Empowerment Leverage Project.
For further information and discussion about how you can help take this agenda forward, please contact:
Dr Brian Fisher
Gabriel Chanan
Colin Miller
Jane South

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment

  1. Whilst I wholeheartedly support these aspirations and believe they are a clear signpost to the kind of society that Britain should adhere to; we have Neo-Liberal politicians that cynically pretend to believe in a democratic society, whilst transferring wealth and power to corporate interests; none more graphically transparent that the TTIP agreement that is being secretly being negotiated by Europe’s politicians behind closed doors.

    Ed Miliband also supports this pernicious document claiming without the slightest bit of proof that it will create jobs, We as a democratic nation are being undermined from within, and that not only government but administrators within our public services have been placed in positions of responsibility to oversee the Neo-Liberal agenda and ensure that people are kept ignorant of their actual intentions. The BBC has for over forty years now, been working against the public interest in favour of of corporate power.

    Their anti trade union, pro capitalist doctrine has been obvious for a very long time now, they have indeed become the propaganda arm of corporate interest. Whilst they happily attack trade unionists for defending workers rights, they have been negligent in monitoring the de-industrialisation of our manufacturing base. They never accuse corporate interests of deliberately undermining unions whilst accusing unions of bringing down democracy.

    The whole structure within Britain’s upper echelons has been instituted to deliver the Neo-Liberal agenda; such as Simon Stevens:

    Labour Party[edit]
    He was a Labour councillor for Brixton, in the London Borough of Lambeth 1998–2002.

    From 1988 to 1997 he worked as healthcare manager in UK and internationally. In 1997 he was appointed Policy Adviser to two Secretaries of State for Health (Frank Dobson and Alan Milburn) and from 2001-4 was health policy adviser to Tony Blair. He was closely associated with the development of the NHS Plan 2000.

    From 2004-6 he was President of UnitedHealth Europe and moved on to be Chief Executive Officer of UnitedHealthcare Medicare & Retirement and then President, Global Health, & UnitedHealth Group Executive Vice President of UnitedHealth Group. In October 2013, the speaker biography of Stevens for a health networking conference read, “His responsibilities include leading UnitedHealth’s strategy for, and engagement with, national health reform, ensuring its businesses are positioned for changes in the market and regulatory environment.”[3]

    While in the USA he continued to write articles about the NHS.

    The agenda is clear, they do not represent the aspirations imbued in this article of intent, we need people to understand the degree of betrayal of our so called politicians, and urge people to vote for a genuine alternative.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 827 other subscribers.

Follow us on Twitter