I spent yesterday afternoon with the Labour Party Disabled Members Group discussing their ideas about the future of the Social Security system.  This was a group of people who rely on benefits in various ways, some to enable them to get to work, and some for everything.  When I get their  proposed amendments to the Labour Party policy proposals I will post them here.

Much of the discussion was about the Work Capability Assessment, which they found humiliating, intrusive and unnecessary. Although nobody mentioned the Spartacus Network Beyond the Barriers report their views and proposed solutions were very similar.  They found it hard to see why they needed to be repeatedly examined to see if their amputated limbs had grown back or if incurable degenerative diseases had miraculously reversed.  They dreaded transfer from Disability Living Allowance to Personal Independence Payments, which, as far as they were concerned, did not do what it says on the tin.

What they said about the ability to work was what I have heard elsewhere.  Physical disability, in itself, is a problem most people can cope with, if they can access enough support.  What mostly stops people working is pain, exhaustion, uncertainty and fear, none of which are helped at all by repeated testing.  It’s much easier to cope with a stable disability than one which fluctuates.  Much the biggest cause of incapacity to work is mental illness.  Nearly half of all claimants of incapacity benefits “are in the main disabling group Mental and Behavioural disorders”, and these conditions are the least amenable to objective assessment, especially by a stranger without access to your records.  One of the suggestions that came out of the group was that there should be a combined assessment process, conducted by the NHS, which related to benefits and support of all kinds.

Despite all the anxiety and fear created by the Work Capability Assessment it has had less effect on the total number of claimants than might be expected. The Work Capability Assessment is of course only the latest of many measures to tackle the supposed abuse of incapacity benefits.  In 1982 I was part of an initiative  to transfer unemployed disabled people, who were only expected to sign on once every 13 weeks on to incapacity benefit.  The Thatcher government was later blamed for this initiative, but I can testify it was nothing to do with them.  We intercepted people on their way into the Unemployment Benefit Office and persuaded them they would be better off on the sick. But most had been unemployed for years and looked likely to stay that way.  Like most sick people they wanted to work.

What really makes a difference to the number of people who claim to be incapable of work is the availability of work.  That is why claimants in Surrey are sicker than those in Sunderland.  In Surrey people with minor disabilities can get work.  In Sunderland they can’t.  In Sunderland it seems a perfectly rational decision for a sick person to abandon the idea of getting a job.

Underlying this debate of course is the assumption that people who claim benefits who are sick should get more money than those who are unemployed.  This is only one of many unexamined assumptions which perhaps merit re-examination.  The Social Security system gets much less public discussion than it merits, given how much public money is involved.  Reporting of Social Security issues, which is rare in mainstream media, is generally ill informed.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

6 Comments

  1. My daughter has a condition called Lupus. This condition is rather simular to Rheumatoid Arthritis but unlike Rh Arth it has spells of freedom from pain and restricted movement although they are very rare. The day she appeared before the committee she was reasonably able to move. In fact as she entered the room where these people sat waiting for her, she placed her handbag on the floor next to the chair she sat on. Because she was able to do this on this occasion the chair-person told her she did not qualify for any financial help. How disgraceful this is to make a judgement upon this one move

  2. Martin Rathfelder says:

    Very good, but sad, example. Lupus is a very unpleasant condition, and very unpredictable. Inspecting the person on one day doesn’t tell you much

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 567 other subscribers.

Follow us on Twitter

%d bloggers like this: