By Brian Fisher in a personal capacity

I’m a GP in Lewisham and have been involved in the campaign as clinician, resident and Clinical Commissioning Group worker.

I have never seen so much involvement, enthusiasm and passion for a health issue. Through impressive organisation and a superb comms and press team, we have triggered deep feelings of anger and resistance.

People in the borough see a distant political machine riding rudely over our services, our interests and our health. The unfairness seems blatant and the attitude casual and dismissive.

You can feel the top-down reorganisation.

The campaign has been organised by a febrile mix of groups who clash, compete and complain – topics at meetings are contested, the atmosphere is literally full of hot air. But the outcomes are vital, positive and imaginative, with a lot of flexibility thrown in. The Labour Party has been well represented, as has the SHA. I can’t say it’s fun, but it is exciting and hugely positive.

Hunt has now ruled against the people of Lewisham. With a small tweak, the Trust Special Administrator’s plans are in essence endorsed. We will lose safe maternity and paediatric provision and the A+E will be downgraded. Healthcare will be worse for the population of Lewisham.

This is quite unacceptable.

The TSA’s computer generated accountancy can be contested. Alternative calculations from the same figures show that financial balance could be reached in SE London even if Lewisham were left alone and took over Woolwich Hospital.

No-one is suggesting that we should not change and improve care. In many pathways, care could be closer to home and probably cheaper and better. But to sacrifice a thriving popular hospital for the sake of an ideology that has hardly a scrap of evidence to back it up is an example that we cannot allow to happen elsewhere. Hunt will use this approach to speed up crushing reconfigurations across the country with compressed consultation.

We can see how bankers are protected while patients are sacrificed. How the marketisation of healthcare means that A+E patients have to be funnelled elsewhere so that they can be made to fund other hospitals under threat. How a national neo-liberal programme prioritises austerity instead of growth and forces the NHS to make savings that are then lost to the Treasury.

At Lewisham we shall continue to fight.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment

  1. Excellent analysis of Health Public Servants & NHS Confederation constantly making the case for lesser provision of services for us when we’ve paid for them for 60 years ! They argue bunkum “that closing smaller units makes bigger units better and more efficient ” and all the business people love it, all the rich millionaire Tories love it and all the rich who really want a privatised NHS anyway love it as they can get Health queue jumping perks- for their dirty mostly stolen money.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 830 other subscribers.

Follow us on Twitter