Socialist Health Association Promoting Health through Socialism

Where next for User Involvement?

Professor Jonathan Tritter

Chief Executive
NHS Centre for Involvement

Public Involvement in the NHS: Is LINks the way Forward
Friend’s Meeting House, Coventry 25 June 2007

Outline:

The evolution of Involvement in UK Health Policy

Thinking about Involvement

Introducing the NHS Centre for Involvement

How are we organised and what do we do

The Future of Patient and Public in England

PPI in Commissioning

Local Involvement Networks

Patient and Public Involvement in the NHS

Long history:

1974 - Establishment of Community Health Councils

1992 - Citizen’ Charter Initiative

1999 - Patient and Public Involvement in the New NHS

2001 - The Health and Social Care Act 2001

2002 - NHS Reform and Health Care Professionals Act 2002

2006 - The Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill

Does User = Patient, Carer, Consumer, Customer or Citizen?

For the UK Government

User Involvement = Patient and Public Involvement

“This is a package of radical reform. It will enhance and encourage the involvement of citizens in redesigning the health service from the patient’s point of view.” (Department of Health, 2000: 95)

Choice and Involvement? Foundation Trusts

Why involve users?

Legitimacy
Of approach
Funding and organisation

Relevance
Different kinds of questions
Focus on process and experience not just outcomes

Participation
Support, Co-production and Compliance

Impact
Efficiency and effectiveness of care
More acceptable patient pathway

Conceptualising user involvement

User participation in decisions about treatment and care

User involvement in service development
Planning and design of services
Commissioning

User evaluation of service provision
Public Accountability rather than Patient Satisfaction
Regulation

User involvement in teaching

User involvement in research
At all stages of the research cycle

Potential Pitfalls of User Involvement

Marketisation
Individualisation rather than collectivisation
Customer surveys not involvement
Private sector
Cream skimming
Undermining risk pooling

Tokenism
Capture by medical elite
Capture by managerial elite
Capture by local political elite

Apathy or unwillingness to be ‘involved’

Tensions between ‘choice’ and ‘involvement’

Involvement to Impact

PPI accepted practice

Lack of clarity about how to do it
about who to involve

Direct and Indirect involvement
Direct: people playing a part in making decisions
Indirect: people as source of experience, ideas and information

Need to focus on Impact
Making a difference
Evidence that PPI has had an influence on practice

The NHS Centre for Involvement

Response to an European-wide Tender

Successful Consortium
University of Warwick
LMTA - an alliance for health
Centre for Public Scrutiny

The Centre announced on 24 May 2006
The Health Minister Rosie Winterton

Start of set-up phase from 1 June 2006

Formal launch 28 November 2006

Funded for three years in the first instance

What the Centre does:

Supporting NHS staff and organisations across England to engage with patients and the public more effectively and implement change based on their information

Working with NHS organisations and staff to integrate user involvement systems into everyday working
Fulfilling obligations under Section 11 Health and Social Care Act 2001
(and its successor)

Working with the Healthcare Commission
The Regulator on how to inspect compliance

Organising our Work:

Research and Best Practice
Gathering and generating evidence
Methodological development

Organisational Development
Working with NHS Organisations to build PPI Systems
Meeting Core Standard 17

Learning and Support
Identifying and responding to needs
Curriculum development
Identification and accreditation of providers

The People Bank

Patient-Citizen Exchange & PPI Professionals Exchange

Horizon Scanning: UK Policy Challenges

Local Involvement Networks (LINks)
Voluntary and Community organisations
Health and Social Care

Patient and public involvement in commissioning
Practice Based Commissioning

Increased commissioning from non-NHS providers

Increased Patient Choice

Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill (2006)

Local Involvement Networks (LINks)
Promoting and supporting the involvement of people in the commissioning, provision and scrutiny of local care services
Obtaining the views of people about their needs for, and their experiences of local care services
Making the views known through reports and recommendations about how local care services might be improved
(Part 11 Section 153 subsection 2)

2nd Reading in House of Lords
In to committee 21 June

DH response to Parliamentary Health Select Committee Inquiry in to PPI 11 June 2007

Expected Royal Assent October 2007

LINks Operational from 1 April 2008
Host organisations commissioned for three years from 1 April 2008

How will LINks Work?

LINks will assist NHS provider organisations to engage with the local community to improve services

LINks will set their own agenda and focus on issues of concern to local people and seek to influence change

LINks will be integral in commissioning decisions to ensure they reflect the views of local people

National Voices

National LINks

Established in all Local Authority who commission social services
153 across England

LINks will be supported by a Host organisation
Contracted by Local Authority
Commission/deliver tailored programme of learning and support

New money from DH (circa £100k/year)
Formula based
Pooling resources with LA involvement activities on social services

LINks and accountability

Accounting to the local community
To the regulator(s)
To local providers
To local commissioners

Accounting for the views of local people
Priorities for local services
Evaluation of local services
Responsiveness by local services

PPI and Commissioning

PPI at all points in the commissioning cycle
Plan
Contract
Monitor
Revise

Commissioning along Patient Pathways

PPI in Practice Based Commissioning
Opportunities
Problems

Piloting LINks

9 Pilot and Early Adopter Sites across the country

Capturing the Learning
Ongoing dissemination through NCI website
Initial report of learning early July 2007

Working with:
the Healthcare Commission,
the Commission for Patient and Public Involvement in Health
Department of Health (and others)

Governance arrangements to balance stakeholders
Wariness and mistrust of Local Authorities
Establishing set of ‘ground rules’ for behaviour and the consequences of inappropriate behaviour

Geography is important
Community profiling and mapping the voluntary sector central to effective set up

LINks annual reports should be analysed to identify regional and national issues
Feedback to individual LINks

Need for clarity and control of payments to individual LINks members

Little attention to collaboration between LINks
Particular concern for Ambulance Services

Little attention to defining success criteria or measurement of impact

Procurement of a Host
Some work on pooling resources for Host to cover three LINks areas

Limited work on how a LINk identifies an issue and engages with the topic

“One of the key roles of civil society organizations is to hold health care providers as well as governments accountable for what they do and how they do it….yet without mechanisms enabling people to hold officials accountable, stewardship may falter. To enable effective pressure for accountability, accurate information about health and health systems performance is required throughout civil society.” (WHO, 2003: 126)

The NHS Centre for Involvement

Modelling and facilitating transformation
Building capacity
Supporting a sustainable approach to change

Contact us at: nhscentreforinvolvement@warwick.ac.uk

last updated 23/07/08