What we are
Who are we
Conferences
Discussion
News
Socialism and Health
Reports and policies
Obesity
History
The Black Report
Health Law
Feasible Socialism
Glossary of Acronyms

Understanding obesity in a changing food environment

Professor Andrew Hill Academic Unit of Psychiatry, Leeds University Medical School

An obesity epidemic? - epidemic is not the right word. Obesity is not objectively defined. A small change in the criteria produces a large change in the incidence

  Men Women
1980 6% 8%
1993 13% 16%
1995 15% 18%
1997 17% 20%
1999 19% 21%
2004 23% 24%

(Health Survey for England)

Trends in children's obesity

A toxic or obesogenic environment

Obesity as a normal response to an abnormal environment, side-effect of technology & prosperity reflects natural human preferences (eg easy, convenient, fast, low effort, value for money)

In conjunction with variability in tendency to weight gain e.g. thrifty genes

Modern environment/biology mismatches

Stimulating eating Reducing activity
strong signals to eat weak activity signal
weak signals to stop strong signals to stop
rewarding inactivity is rewarding
no viable alternatives inactivity is a viable alternative
eating well is high status inactivity is high status
increased availability reduced availability

Current approach to obesity:

Lifestyle, choice, individual responsibility

Fails to acknowledge:

Declining energy intake over time

This supposed reduction in consumption could be contrasted to:

10 year increases (Mintel, 2004):

Cakes

Changing food environment
Decreased Increased
real cost of food opportunity cost of cooking
cost of energy-dense foods food eaten away from home
local food availability food promotion
family dining portion sizes
  food variety

External influences on food intake

Influences on food consumption

Key Messages

Table laden with food