What we are
Who are we
Conferences
Discussion
News
Socialism and Health
Reports and policies
SHA Branches
History
The Black Report
Health Law
Feasible Socialism
Glossary of Acronyms

Enterprising Solutions for the NHS

Big Life logo

Fay Selvan Chief Executive of the Big Life Group Liverpool 3/2/06

Just give you a quick overview of our activities

Issues – not a partnership - it is a group – benefit of group and brand value - control

Definition of a social business can be very broad – does not distribute profits, has social aim, acts in a business like way – different organisational forms. Lot of debate – Co-ops, BUPA. Herein lies a problem – I think social business has to have added value – not just a particular org form or not for profit distribution.

Today going to talk about one example of our work – which I think demonstrates how social business can offer added value to the NHS. In particular it can contribute to the health inequalities agenda

Big Life structure diagramme

Big Life Group – group of social businesses and charities

Working together to help people who have had Raw Deal in life to change their lives

And change the world while we are at it.

Have wide range of activities

The Kath Locke Centre This is the Kath Locke Centre in Moss Side Manchester

Winning the contract - Bid against 4 NHS trusts with turnovers of £60m each – we had 250k p.a. It was a key stage in the development of the Big Life group – now one of the largest social businesses in the country with 200 plus staff, 8m turnover, 5 social businesses and two charities.

We had no track record of owning buildings or of running health facilities. Didn’t know what an autoclave was – let alone how to maintain one. But always knew we could find someone who did!

But we did have a track record in :

Of course long before CPLNHS and this week's white paper – policy drivers towards plurality in the market place

Health Authority at the time was very forward thinking and took a real risk in awarding us this contract

KLC has been open for ten years now – V Successful Services are provided by ourselves, the PCT, Local Authority, Mental Health Trust and range of voluntary sector providers

Reception

So what difference has it made?

Local employment – 77% of our staff at KLC live locally

Staff diversity

Environment – welcoming – hotel style, no barriers, no vandalsim/burglaries

All this helps make our services be accessible to local people….Because when we opened Moss Side was a very different area to how it is now…

Newspaper portrayal of Moss Side
Known as Gunchester –

Most public sector buildings were like forts – aimed to lock people out – or into little confined spaces. Some services were not available in the area because of its reputation – BREAST SCREENING VAN hadn't ben to Moss Side for ten years

The Sugar Group But its not just the envornment and welcoming environment and staff that can make services accessible

More than that

This is the Sugar group - formed by West Indian ladies with diabetes and run by them.

We also developed a Dental service

We have also worked to influence the statutory sector services in the centre – Mental Health Team

PCT community involvement stragegy – Local Area groups

The CafeThe centre also helps build a sustainable local community. This is the green plate cafe – local social business. Local people feel the centre is theirs – local ownership – can get involved in what happens here and have a say – helps build social cohesion. And it works with wide range of people – LD, Older people, people with mental health needs, children, asylum seeekers - everyone is welcome – not segregated – helps marginalised people feel included.

Massage

KLC is patient choice - Choice of counsellor – ethnicity, gender. Helping people find their own solutions – healthy living projects and self help groups. This is the way forward for the NHS

Choice research – four factors – clinical quality, location, amenities – but also social interaction – how you are treated when you get there.

Was PCT chair – not taken on a small old DGH – we have a lot to learn about attracting patients if we are going to survive in the world of PbR

I personally don’t believe that it would make a great deal of difference transferring whole sections of the NHS and replicating what they provide for everybody in a co-op – but do think that the opportunity for engaging social enterprises in the NHS as a way of meeting the needs of marginalised communities and tackling health inequalities – a regeneration agenda

Dancing at Moss Side Carnival

But if this is going to be a reality then we need to change some things

Overall, exciting time of change and opportunity. Best scenario – organisations like ours can take up opportunities. Or status quo – lot of organisational change – but little change in the way services delivered. Worst case – new private sector providers sweep up the opportunities and the better off areas benefit most – with widening gap of inequality

Me I'm an optimist – but it is down to us to make it happen.